Buy Now

Short items from Indian press reports that Infosys will buy the BPO operations of Philips Electronics NV. When it closes, it will be another item in the on-going rejigging of the BPO industry. Captive operations become part of independents. And operations that managers once thought vital or contained too many secrets to let outsiders peek at them now become outsource-able. What was it I heard at a cocktail party recently? In rapidly-changing businesses, there are no secrets. Just speed of execution.

India's second-biggest software-maker will be taking over all the costs of this acquisition, similar to the manner in which rival Tata Consultancy Services bought the operations of UK's Pearl Group insurers, the website reported. The acquisition will add to Infosys current BPO unit, which has close to 11,000 employees, providing the company with round-the-clock processing, the report
added.

Here's Times of India's take:

Infosys Technologies is said to be close to acquiring the finance and accounting BPO arm of Philips Global. The Philips arm has an employee strength of 1,500 globally, including a 500 strong force in Chennai. The other facilities are in Warsaw and Bangkok. The BPO arm is said to have assured revenues of $200 million spread over five years.

Bagging The Citi

Would you buy a business from a bank? Would you buy a business that is solely dependent on that bank? Citibank is close to a sale of its captive BPO, according to Indian press reports. The information asymmetry seems to favor Citibank, since who better knows the bank's prospects -- and the outsourcing potential going forward -- than itself.


If you're a buyer, it makes sense to pay the reported $1.2 billion price if you're confident you can cut costs in the unit faster or deeper than Citi thinks, and if you can use the Citibank BPO as a platform to acquire other bank customers. What better calling card than to say to future customers, "The largest bank in the world outsources to me."

Citigroup's BPO arm, Citigroup Global Services, is likely to find a new owner in a week. Surprisingly, big names like IBM, Infosys, TCS and Blackstone, which were in the race for the BPO firm, have fallen by the wayside, citing expensive valuations. The fight is now between half a dozen suitors comprising Genpact, First Source, WNS, 3i and a couple of private equity investors. Citigroup's BPO arm was recently put on the block and is likely to be valued around $1.2 billion. "The multiples are going to be pretty high here.

That means the buyers require to cough up anything up to $1.2 billion. Third party BPO firms in India are yet to have such deep pockets. Again, sinking large chunks of money upfront on a non-core cause may not be the right option for domestic IT services providers. That clearly leaves the game with big boys like IBM and monied PE guys who are willing to wait for ROI and capable of taking risk,'' says Pari Natarajan, CEO, Zinnov, a Silicon Valley-based offshore research and consulting firm.
For Genpact, the former captive unit of GE, this acquisition would reaffirm its leadership position in the country, while for WNS, acquiring Citigroup Global would give it a presence in the financial services sector. WNS, a legal service and financial services company, has made a few unsuccessful attempts to add financial services to its portfolio and is looking to make a splash by bagging this deal.First Source, on the other hand, is already a specialised player in the banking and insurance sector and the addition of the Citigroup's captive unit will bring them practices that banks usually don't outsource to third party players.

Blackstone Flag to Fly in Philippines

A Reuters news story in the NYTimes website says Blackstone Group has bought Intelenet Global Services of India, teaming up with its management in an 80-20 venture. The buyout price was in the region of $200 million.

This marks the first foray in the industry for Blackstone. And such big boys with deep pockets don't usually stop at one deal. Rollup strategy, anyone?

The British bank Barclays and an Indian mortgage firm, the Housing Development Finance Corporation, said separately that they each were selling their holdings in Intelenet, without disclosing the price.

Intelenet plans to expand its operations in Britain and begin services out of the Philippines and Mauritius, said its chief executive, Susir Kumar.

If Citi Can Do It, So Can HSBC

HSBC , according to this press report, will add a few thousand more jobs in the Philippines to serve its US and UK customers. As more and more financial bigwigs such as AIG and Citibank cluster their in-house operations in the Philippines, you can say the Philippines is becoming the center of backroom operations -- the contradictory terms intended.

...the visiting bank official said HSBC is committed to the country in terms of expanding its banking services and its support group by increasing its Business
Processing Outsourcing (BPO) operations.
A third BPO is scheduled to open this coming year, which will increase the total employees of the bank on a consolidated basis to roughly 11,000, disclosed HSBC Philippines Chief Executive Officer Mark Watkinson. Specifically, its banking operations employs a total of 2,500 and 5,500 for BPOs.
At present, the bank has a couple of BPOs, one in Ayala-Alabang and another in PBCom Tower at the heart of the Central Makati Business District. These two service HSBC’s clients in the United States and United Kingdom.
It was explained the Philippines has an edge to service the bank’s US and UK customer base because of the natural talent of locals to speak English as a second language.

WaMu Chooses Cebu

Washington Mutual (stock symbol: WM) is putting in a captive operation in Cebu, the Philippines' second-largest metropolitan area.

Joel Mari Yu, Cebu Investment Promotions Center managing director, announced the entry of Washington Mutual Inc., one of US’ leading retailers of financial services catering to consumers and small business banks. He said WaMu will be among the locators of a 12-story building that will be constructed in the Asiatown IT Park (AITP).

While WaMu's entry into the Philippines will mean an addition of 1,500 jobs to the country's burgeoning BPO industry, what happens to PeopleSupport?

BPOing the HMOs

We've all heard about medical tourism -- rich country citizens traveling to poorer nations to have surgery, either critical or cosmetic, that they can't afford back home.
Here's the thought. If a consulting firm like Accenture can hire doctors in poor countries to shephard drugs through clinical trials, why can't it hire those same doctors to shephard rich-country patients to recovery?
In the U.S., HMOs were set up to deal with runaway health costs. Is the next stage in the battle against ever-rising medical costs offshoring the HMOs' work? As this online article suggests, the cost savings available to U.S. corporations with mounting health bills are just too huge to ignore:

In what could be the next big step in the outsourcing saga, big corporates in the US are planning to offshore their employee healthcare to India.
Wal-Mart hires over a million employees in the US – spending $8,000 on each employee's healthcare every year takes its total expenditure to a staggering $8 billion. What if Wal-Mart could save 90 per cent of that amount with help from us?
As health insurance gets painfully expensive in the US, huge cost advantages of medical procedures in countries like India are proving to be irresistible for companies there including those on the Fortune 500 list.
Mercer Health & Benefits Dr Arnold Milstein said, “We estimate that the price advantage for the most efficient Indian hospitals would be around 85 per cent to 90 per cent."
American companies are obviously feeling the heat. Many believe that unless they control the spiraling health expenditure their profits could start taking a serious hit by 2008.
A study suggests that outsourcing of health care can easily reduce the showroom price of a GM car by a thousand dollars – it's all very simple logic so what's the problem?

The First Gram is Always Free

There's a study out by Compact Management Consulting on how IT and BPO outsourcers deliver cost savings in the first year, and then ratchet up their prices in successive years, making them the costlier option for a company than if it kept the service in-house.

The research, based on an analysis of 240 deals worth more than £20m, found that outsourcing providers were pricing contracts to produce savings of up 18% compared with in-house costs in the first year. But costs then began to escalate, reaching 36% above comparable top quartile internal operations by year three. . . .

Simon Scarrott, head of business development and marketing at Compass, said: “With those figures, it is easy to see why the claim that all outsourcing will save money is a myth. There can be sound strategic reasons for outsourcing but saving money over the long term is not one of them.”

He added: “Outsourcing providers are not that different from an in-house operation. Indeed, they often use the same people as the in-house operation after the deal is signed and outsourcers cannot perform alchemy on a business process and turn an operation into gold.”

Hold on. There are significant savings involved if the business model is to arbitrage the labor costs between an expensive developed country's workers and the cheaper rates available in a developing country. So even if you are still using the same number of IT programmers, clerks, project managers, and customer representatives, there's no doubt the correct outsourcer can do it, cheaper.

Then again, even if you, the chief information officer of a fast-growing company, take the Compass study as gospel truth, you can always choose what Aviva has done -- get an outsourcer to build it for you so you can enjoy the first and second-year savings, and then take over the facility.

The previous month, Aviva transferred 1,600 employees in Bangalore from an outsourcing vendor, 24/7 Customer, to Aviva Global Services. It was the first move of its kind and size in the Indian business processing outsourcing industry, NASSCOM said.

When a vendor creates a call center for a company, runs it for a certain period of time, then hands the operation over to the company, it's called the build-operate-transfer (BOT) model. Typically, a company moving operations to India would build the operation from scratch, or subcontract the operation to an outsourcing vendor, or some combination of the two.

The BOT approach lets a company get going in India faster, Aviva executives said at the ceremony in Mumbai. That helps Aviva, and its Norwich Union insurance subsidiary, adapt to change, [Executive Director Patrick] Snowball said when he accepted the award.

"Our excellent operations in India are critical for us to ensure we maintain a competitive advantage," he said. Aviva has worked with three vendors under the BOT model: EXL, WNS and 24/7 Customer. Over the course of the year, 5,000 employees will be transferred from those vendors to Aviva's own offshore division. The Bangalore facility was just the first to be transferred. Later this year, the company will transfer facilities in Sri Lanka to its control, and in Pune.