Showing posts with label security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label security. Show all posts

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Medical Fallout

There's always a downside. Here's one view of the human cost not carried on the balance sheets of India's mighty BPO industry.


There's mounting medical evidence that if people are forced to stay up night after night their biorhythms are disrupted and they are liable to pay a cost in terms of both physical and psychological health. Elevated pay isn't sufficient compensation for a heart attack brought on at 30. We can't drive young people into the BPO industry by painting a superficially alluring image of its rewards, then shrug and turn away when they face serious health issues. Experts are concerned that the brewing crisis could undermine India's economic boom, which has been driven to a large extent by the services sector. A study by the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations estimated that heart diseases, strokes and diabetes cost India $9 billion in lost productivity in 2005. They forecast this figure to grow to a whopping $200 billion in the next decade, with the IT sector predicted to be among the hardest-hit.
I won't be a pied piper singing the praises of the capitalism system, but the long-term view argues for us to have faith. When an industry's health woes become a big enough problem, the solutions will come. If entrepreneurs have set up bars catering to the graveyard shift workers -- blackened windows to simulate night even though it's noontime -- why can't a whole city be transformed? Interiors of buildings are now made to follow the daylight hours of countries halfway around the globe; why can't the district where the building belongs also follow those same hours? If the human body can't evolve to cope with altered circadian rhythms, why the environment will have to be reshaped. If we all live on borrowed time, why can't we advance that clock +12 hours?

Wednesday, July 4, 2007

Bagging The Citi

Would you buy a business from a bank? Would you buy a business that is solely dependent on that bank? Citibank is close to a sale of its captive BPO, according to Indian press reports. The information asymmetry seems to favor Citibank, since who better knows the bank's prospects -- and the outsourcing potential going forward -- than itself.


If you're a buyer, it makes sense to pay the reported $1.2 billion price if you're confident you can cut costs in the unit faster or deeper than Citi thinks, and if you can use the Citibank BPO as a platform to acquire other bank customers. What better calling card than to say to future customers, "The largest bank in the world outsources to me."

Citigroup's BPO arm, Citigroup Global Services, is likely to find a new owner in a week. Surprisingly, big names like IBM, Infosys, TCS and Blackstone, which were in the race for the BPO firm, have fallen by the wayside, citing expensive valuations. The fight is now between half a dozen suitors comprising Genpact, First Source, WNS, 3i and a couple of private equity investors. Citigroup's BPO arm was recently put on the block and is likely to be valued around $1.2 billion. "The multiples are going to be pretty high here.

That means the buyers require to cough up anything up to $1.2 billion. Third party BPO firms in India are yet to have such deep pockets. Again, sinking large chunks of money upfront on a non-core cause may not be the right option for domestic IT services providers. That clearly leaves the game with big boys like IBM and monied PE guys who are willing to wait for ROI and capable of taking risk,'' says Pari Natarajan, CEO, Zinnov, a Silicon Valley-based offshore research and consulting firm.
For Genpact, the former captive unit of GE, this acquisition would reaffirm its leadership position in the country, while for WNS, acquiring Citigroup Global would give it a presence in the financial services sector. WNS, a legal service and financial services company, has made a few unsuccessful attempts to add financial services to its portfolio and is looking to make a splash by bagging this deal.First Source, on the other hand, is already a specialised player in the banking and insurance sector and the addition of the Citigroup's captive unit will bring them practices that banks usually don't outsource to third party players.

Thursday, May 17, 2007

WaMu Chooses Cebu

Washington Mutual (stock symbol: WM) is putting in a captive operation in Cebu, the Philippines' second-largest metropolitan area.
Joel Mari Yu, Cebu Investment Promotions Center managing director, announced the entry of Washington Mutual Inc., one of US’ leading retailers of financial services catering to consumers and small business banks. He said WaMu will be among the locators of a 12-story building that will be constructed in the Asiatown IT Park (AITP).
While WaMu's entry into the Philippines will mean an addition of 1,500 jobs to the country's burgeoning BPO industry, what happens to PeopleSupport?

Monday, April 30, 2007

BPOing the HMOs

We've all heard about medical tourism -- rich country citizens traveling to poorer nations to have surgery, either critical or cosmetic, that they can't afford back home.
Here's the thought. If a consulting firm like Accenture can hire doctors in poor countries to shephard drugs through clinical trials, why can't it hire those same doctors to shephard rich-country patients to recovery?
In the U.S., HMOs were set up to deal with runaway health costs. Is the next stage in the battle against ever-rising medical costs offshoring the HMOs' work? As this online article suggests, the cost savings available to U.S. corporations with mounting health bills are just too huge to ignore:
In what could be the next big step in the outsourcing saga, big corporates in the US are planning to offshore their employee healthcare to India.
Wal-Mart hires over a million employees in the US – spending $8,000 on each employee's healthcare every year takes its total expenditure to a staggering $8 billion. What if Wal-Mart could save 90 per cent of that amount with help from us?
As health insurance gets painfully expensive in the US, huge cost advantages of medical procedures in countries like India are proving to be irresistible for companies there including those on the Fortune 500 list.
Mercer Health & Benefits Dr Arnold Milstein said, “We estimate that the price advantage for the most efficient Indian hospitals would be around 85 per cent to 90 per cent."
American companies are obviously feeling the heat. Many believe that unless they control the spiraling health expenditure their profits could start taking a serious hit by 2008.
A study suggests that outsourcing of health care can easily reduce the showroom price of a GM car by a thousand dollars – it's all very simple logic so what's the problem?

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

The First Gram is Always Free

There's a study out by Compact Management Consulting on how IT and BPO outsourcers deliver cost savings in the first year, and then ratchet up their prices in successive years, making them the costlier option for a company than if it kept the service in-house.

The research, based on an analysis of 240 deals worth more than £20m, found that outsourcing providers were pricing contracts to produce savings of up 18% compared with in-house costs in the first year. But costs then began to escalate, reaching 36% above comparable top quartile internal operations by year three. . . .

Simon Scarrott, head of business development and marketing at Compass, said: “With those figures, it is easy to see why the claim that all outsourcing will save money is a myth. There can be sound strategic reasons for outsourcing but saving money over the long term is not one of them.”

He added: “Outsourcing providers are not that different from an in-house operation. Indeed, they often use the same people as the in-house operation after the deal is signed and outsourcers cannot perform alchemy on a business process and turn an operation into gold.”


Hold on. There are significant savings involved if the business model is to arbitrage the labor costs between an expensive developed country's workers and the cheaper rates available in a developing country. So even if you are still using the same number of IT programmers, clerks, project managers, and customer representatives, there's no doubt the correct outsourcer can do it, cheaper.

Then again, even if you, the chief information officer of a fast-growing company, take the Compass study as gospel truth, you can always choose what Aviva has done -- get an outsourcer to build it for you so you can enjoy the first and second-year savings, and then take over the facility.

The previous month, Aviva transferred 1,600 employees in Bangalore from an outsourcing vendor, 24/7 Customer, to Aviva Global Services. It was the first move of its kind and size in the Indian business processing outsourcing industry, NASSCOM said.

When a vendor creates a call center for a company, runs it for a certain period of time, then hands the operation over to the company, it's called the build-operate-transfer (BOT) model. Typically, a company moving operations to India would build the operation from scratch, or subcontract the operation to an outsourcing vendor, or some combination of the two.

The BOT approach lets a company get going in India faster, Aviva executives said at the ceremony in Mumbai. That helps Aviva, and its Norwich Union insurance subsidiary, adapt to change, [Executive Director Patrick] Snowball said when he accepted the award.

"Our excellent operations in India are critical for us to ensure we maintain a competitive advantage," he said. Aviva has worked with three vendors under the BOT model: EXL, WNS and 24/7 Customer. Over the course of the year, 5,000 employees will be transferred from those vendors to Aviva's own offshore division. The Bangalore facility was just the first to be transferred. Later this year, the company will transfer facilities in Sri Lanka to its control, and in Pune.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Out-Doing the Outsourcers

Business Process Outsourcing is the current jargon of choice to encompass an industry helping the Indian and Philippine economies modernize. Do you date yourself when you say the term should just be simplified to "supplier"? After all, does not Toyota Motors, the world's most valuable automaker, rely on outsiders to provide key parts for its machines? Nowhere in their lexicon do they refer to it as BPO/KPO. In the electronics industry, the term is contract manufacturing, such as Microsoft leaving it up to Flextronics to manufacture the hardware for its Xbox.

Now when you hear the name Accenture, the first thing that comes to mind is "consulting." Here's an interesting piece from BusinessWeek. You would not normally associate the name Accenture with the "d-word".

To see how Accenture is offering hard-to-match services, take a look inside the company's Life Sciences Center of Excellence in Bangalore. The sprawling office building houses dozens of medical doctors, PhDs, pharmacists, math whizzes, and statisticians. They work alongside biology grads to prepare clinical trial reports for the world's top drug companies.These high-skill employees—all of them Indian—coordinate closely with business consultants who are on site with clients around the world. Accenture consultants help clients revamp the way they handle the trials essential to getting new drugs approved by regulators. Once those processes are sharpened, Accenture software programmers in Bangalore design databases and algorithms for storing and analyzing clinical data. Accenture people distribute electronic forms to physicians who conduct the trials. Accenture's physicians review the data to spot errors and, when necessary, get on the phone with doctors conducting the trials. When all the data are collected, they analyze them for safety and effectiveness and write reports. All told, Accenture has cut the average time to prepare reports from six months to a few weeks. Each day saved is worth about $1 million to a drug company.

But just as important, one client, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. (WYE ), says it has been able to hand off huge chunks of work to a partner that can perform them even better than it can. "We are launching drugs that otherwise would have been held up by our inability to handle the work," says Robert R. Ruffalo Jr., Wyeth's president of research and development.


Of course, few businesses like to refer themselves as "suppliers" because of the connotation that what they are providing is a commodity. But anytime a business changes its value proposition to the customer from "doing things cheaper" to "doing things you could not do," that supplier becomes a powerful force -- and then the buyer wouldn't care what term is used.

C'mon, Aussie, C'mon

It's somewhat hilarious what some people will say as they face stiff competition for business. Some resort to FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) attacks. Australia's Sunday Telegraph writes about medical records for transcription being sent to India, Pakistan and the Philippines, where costs are half those in Aussie Land.

Lyndie Arkell, chief executive of the wholly Australian transcription service OzeScribe, described the quality of overseas transcriptions as "absolutely terrible".

"There is a large industry sending work to India because there are doctors who want cheaper transcriptions," she said.

"But they are violating privacy laws and disrespecting their patients' privacy. I don't think patients go to their doctors thinking their records are going to end up in India."

Mistakes and mix-ups in medical terminology are common among overseas transcribers who cannot understand Australian accents, she warned.

Examples included confusion between "hypo" and "hyper" and "perineum" and "peritoneum".

And so mate, only Aussies can understand bloody Aussie accents. No Sanjit or Rajiv or Jose could ever hope to understand the inscrutable Down Under Droll. Crikey.

Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Smart Infinity and Smart Security

In this capital city of 12 million people, if you hang around long enough, it's guaranteed that Corporate Philippines will create a funny situation for you.

I had a meeting at the Ayala Ave. headquarters of Smart, the mobile phone company that's driving the profitability of the most profitable entity in the country. Smart's security procedure, a relic of some bygone era, is to badge you. They require you to log in with your name, address, purpose, time of visit, and signature, and present an ID in exchange for a visitor's tag. It's not only Smart that does this. Almost every other building in Makati badges, even in this age of cheap surveillance cameras. All this on the assumption that anyone intent on committing a crime at your business would fill up the sign-in sheet honestly and present a legitimate ID.

I had with me my Smart Infinity card. So for ID, I presented this blue card, embossed with my name, which signifies I am a valued client. In the parlance of the industry, I am a "high ARPU"subscriber, spending more than US$100 a month on my phone bill. The card supposedly entitles me to VIP treatment and to "experience service at its finest."

What did the person manning the security counter do?

She rejected my card.